Low-molecular weight heparin infusion as anticoagulation for haemodialysis
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND Low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is commonly used as an anticoagulant for haemodialysis by a single-bolus injection. However, its application in extended haemodialysis has been infrequently studied. In particular, for nocturnal home haemodialysis patients sleeping throughout treatment, the need for additional intradialytic bolus might render the use of LMWH impractical. To overcome this limitation, we changed traditional bolus injections to continuous infusion. We first tested our method among in-centre 4-h haemodialysis patients to establish a feasible and safe infusion regimen before utilizing it in extended dialyses at home. METHODS Recruited patients were given nadroparin (standardized at 65 IU/kg) as an anticoagulant for haemodialysis. They were first randomized to receive nadroparin either by bolus injection or infusion. Afterwards, the patients underwent crossover to receive the alternate method of LMWH anticoagulation. The degrees of anticoagulation and bleeding complications were compared. RESULTS Sixteen haemodialysis patients were recruited. After nadroparin administration, anti-Xa levels at the first hour were significantly higher by the bolus than the infusion methods (0.68 ± 0.10 versus 0.49 ± 0.10 IU/mL, P < 0.001) and were similar by the second hour (0.56 ± 0.10 versus 0.55 ± 0.11 IU/mL, P = 0.64). At the sixth hour, anti-Xa levels by the infusion method were significantly higher (0.35 ± 0.13 versus 0.25 ± 0.10 IU/mL, P < 0.001), suggesting the infusion approach required a dosage reduction. There were no bleeding events reported in either method. CONCLUSIONS LMWH infusion is feasible and safe. The method avoids early excessive anticoagulation caused by bolus injection and reduces the LMWH dose. Future studies should be conducted to evaluate LMWH infusion in extended haemodialysis treatment.
منابع مشابه
Comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin sodium) and standard unfractionated heparin for haemodialysis anticoagulation.
BACKGROUND Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) has been suggested as providing safe, efficient, convenient and possibly more cost-effective anticoagulation for haemodialysis (HD) than unfractionated heparin, with fewer side-effects and possible benefits on uraemic dyslipidaemia. METHODS In this prospective, randomized, cross-over study we compared the safety, clinical efficacy and cost effect...
متن کاملUremic Toxins and Lipases in Haemodialysis: A Process of Repeated Metabolic Starvation
Severe kidney disease results in retention of uremic toxins that inhibit key enzymes for lipid breakdown such as lipoprotein lipase (LPL) and hepatic lipase (HL). For patients in haemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) the LPL activity is only about half of that of age and gender matched controls. Angiopoietin, like protein 3 and 4, accumulate in the uremic patients. These factors, ther...
متن کاملLimitations of the laboratory monitoring of heparin therapy. Scientific and Standardization Committee Communications: on behalf of the Control of Anticoagulation Subcommittee of the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis.
Heparin is the most widely used anticoagulant for the prevention and initial treatment of venous thromboembolism, for haemodialysis and cardiopulmonary bypass procedures and, with aspirin, for the management of acute coronary syndromes. In venous thrombosis and coronary disease low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) have been demonstrated to be at least as effective and safe as unfractionated he...
متن کاملWeight watching in cardiology: low molecular weight heparin for acute coronary syndromes.
Heparin is available for clinical use since the 1950’s and has over the last years firmly established its role as the anticoagulant agent of choice in the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism as well as in the manw x agement of acute coronary syndromes 1 . Heparin anticoagulation, however, has limitations, partly due to the unpredictable bioavailability of the compound and its lar...
متن کامل[Patients with oral anticoagulation--bridging anticoagulation in the perioperative phase].
Oral anticoagulation with a vitamin K-antagonist requires special consideration when surgery or interventional procedures are planned. This is mainly due to the half life of vitamin K-antagonists and to the need for safe and effective anticoagulation prior to and during surgery as well as in the postoperative period. So far, the continuous infusion of unfractionated heparin (UFH) has been the m...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره 9 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016